Please do not take this piece as an attack on either Tom Cole or Jerry Anderson. It is not meant to be. In 1994 Hali Magazine (HALI 76) a British publication published the Tom Cole Interview with Jerry Anderson interview. It is an important work and I find it valuable. However year after year Jerry Anderson escalates as some sort of infallible Uber source of all wisdom on Baluch Rugs. Some seem to see Anderson's wisdom as the gold standard by which all Baluch rug facts must be judged. I for one find much I can accept in the interview but there are a few minor points that trouble me and that is what this page is about. HALI: What are the origins of the Baluch people of
Baluchistan? JBOC: If Anderson is right that the Baluch are, Assyrian, of Assyro-Arabic ethnic origin then this is a testable proposition. If the Baluch are Assyrian they should speak an Afro-Asiatic, Semitic language or at least a Indo European Persian language with a heavy degree of Afro-Asiatic-Semitic borrow words. This is not the case at all. The Baluch Language Family Tree is Indo-European, Indo-Iranian, Iranian, Western, Northwestern, Balochi. The Ethnologue So an Assyrian origin of the Baluch is not supportable and Anderson must be disregarded on this point. JBOC: Then Anderson dumps the Assyrian Balochi scenario and introduces the Scythian scenario: JERRY ANDERSON: The political and cultural centre of this confederacy is located in Sistan, originally referred to as Sakastan, the land of the Sakas or Scythians. It was these people, the descendants of the weavers of the Pazyryk, who populated the area of Sistan. At the time of the Arab invasions, the name was changed to Sijistan (sand country), and from that it eventually evolved, over about a thousand years, into the name we know today. The weavers of these pile rugs are ethnically a Scythian people. JBOC: So are the weaving Baluch really Scythians? This asks a huge leap of faith on our parts. There are things commonly accepted in the field and there are things that are controversial and not commonly accepted. Anderson is clearly in the controversial area here. The same argument that puts degenerate Scythians in the Baluch ethnic group can be made for Parthians. The real question is how does Anderson know? What are his sources? I find this troubling to say the least. HALI: And the
Mushwani? JBOC:
That the Mashwani as Jewish Khazars chased out of the
Caucasus who did not stop running until they got to
Eastern Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan is an amazing
undocumented, unsupportable, and improbable story. HALI: What accounts for
Seljuk iconography on so-called Baluch rugs? JBOC: The idea that the that Seljuk and Baluch are all the same is problematic. Back to the language problem. The Seljuk are Arsari Turkmen an Altaic language group and The Baluch are Indo European. I have to conclude that while Jerry Anderson is a valuable source he is human. I guess we really knew that all the time. . |
SpongoBongo and Persian Carpet Guide Site Search | ||||||||